Toronto Movies

Star Trek Into Darkness

Star Trek Into Darkness

Score: 7.16 / 10

Release Date: May 16, 2013
Director: J.J. Abrams
Producer: Alex Kurtzman, Bryan Burk, Damon Lindelof, J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, Anton Yelchin, John Cho, Bruce Greenwood, Benedict Cumberbatch, Peter Weller, Alice Eve, Leonard Nimoy, Chris Hemsworth
Genre: Action
Running Time: 132 minutes

Write a Review


Star Trek Into Darkness movie reviews

  • 8

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 2:44:22 PM | (age group: 50 or over.) | M

    New timeline, uses bits of other star trek story lines but does it very well.Sets up the upcoming TV series a continuation of the original TV series.

  • 9

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 11:15:31 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    who is this idiot giving 1 star. I get it's trendy to be negative but give it a rest. This movie was solid from beginning to end. IF you don't like it go watch twilight, but I fear that might be too much plot for you

  • 2

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 11:05:17 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    After reading some of the posts here, I don't think people are angry at the star trek canon changes. Ok so it's a different time line, Vulcan is gone, ok the first movie was good because it was the catalyst of change and they could move in a new direction, slight changes causing different things to happen. that is fine, that is good change, what I think everyone is mad about is the rehash of wrath of khan, think they could have done almost anything and brought something new and different but they didn't and to make a new movie worse then a better version earlier one is what angred the fans.

  • 2

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:55:52 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    They copied wrath of khan, but the khan they used wasn't as charismatic as the original and the plot holes are really big, not worth seeing. it's really horrible movie, makes you want to cry how they mangled it.

  • 2

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:52:12 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    JJ you have no idea how to make a good movie you only try to copy old ones, like wrath of khan, you hack.

  • 2

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:51:05 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    Boo this movie is terrible, it not worth watching once.

  • 2

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:44:45 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    A studio plant can be discovered, if you know the signs. 1. they say a bad movie is good 2. they say don't listen to the bad reviews and try to discredit us 3. they say they are going to see the movie again this is hoping cuz they think by saying it good and they go see again, those of you might go, will go cuz they are going again has to be good right? wrong don't be fooled, it so bad I rather take my 10 bill and burn it then watch this again. I should sue for my first viewing back...

  • 1

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:38:07 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    to boldy go where no one has gone before is their motto, who the heck forgot that mantra when they made this garbage movie. gorns, anything would be better, to say you like this movie is to say you love watching clip shows from series that need to save money so they throw some clips from episodes and put some backstory to tie them together. that is what people are gonna feel like they watched. a clip show with some added features. you ripped us off with this garbage, only a studio plant, a non fan who never seen khan or an idiot would like this trash. just watch next week numbers will drop 70% min, word of mouth already killed this movie.

  • 2

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:33:13 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    Wow can you smell studio plant, they are every where in here now. Child of the 90's or lies from the desperate hoping to discredit the truth so you get tricked into going to see it. it's a crap version of the wrath of khan plain and simple, khan made money so they tried to rehash the formula hoping they make money. they failed miserably with nemesis doing this, then they stupidly tried again with into darkness. even stupid bergman said in an interview they wanted to make nemesis bigger then khan...they stupid exe's should've learned last time. they copied too much of a same storyline, they could have gone anywhere and did anything different, but they didn't, to boldy go where no one has go

  • 10

    Star Trek Into Darkness

    Saturday, May 25, 2013 10:00:32 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    Being a kid in the 80s/90s I watched a lot of trek as much as star wars. JJ did a good job with this movie. For all the nay sayers, well I am sorry you feel JJ *destroyed* star trek, Infact he did not. This series needed new blood pumped into it and this twist of an alternate timeline is quite interesting. Also no one else out there is giving star trek any positive traction or increasing its global awareness/rep at the moment. Rock on JJ, this was good.