Saturday, January 10, 2015 6:10:56 PM | (Age Not Specified)
Fresh and exciting; an exhilarating action pic that keeps you on the edge of your seat the whole time! The trilogy saved the best for last, that's for sure!
Saturday, January 10, 2015 4:36:18 PM | (Age Not Specified)
The worst out of the trilogy. Too many story holes. My eyes were hurting from the hour of hand held shaky camera parts. It should be banned from being released period!
Saturday, January 10, 2015 4:32:35 PM | (Age Not Specified)
The first one was great, the second one wasn't bad but this one is absolutely crap. The story is not half bad, the cast is good but acting isn't great and I blame the director.
The Director did a horrible job. The action was terribly shot, a mix of very shaky hand camera and fast cut scenes back of forth makes you lose track of what is going on and induce headaches.
Liam Nisam, as much as I like him, seemed like an out of shape elderly man in this movie.
The first hour and a half were torture, it wasn't until the last 20 minutes that it became bearable. This one is bad even by horrible hollywood action movie standards. I really feel like I lost my money.
Saturday, January 10, 2015 3:55:16 PM | (Age Not Specified)
It was an average action movie. Taken 1 was amazing and I am a big Liam Neeson fan but this wasn't a good movie. There was nothing particularly thrilling about it. It was quite cheesy in a lot of places. Also the change in actor for Stuart was incredibly noticeable and unfortunate. The "epic" conclusion can easily wait until the movie is released on video on demand.
