Release Date: November 18, 2005 Director: Mike Newell Producer: David Heyman Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Brendan Gleeson, Richard Griffiths, Gary Oldman, Miranda Richardson, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Julie Walters, Stanislav Ianevski, Robert Pattinson, Clémence Poésy, David Tennant Genre: Fantasy Running Time: 156 minutes
Sunday, November 20, 2005 10:22:04 AM | (Age Not Specified)
it was the best harry potter movie theyve made it was amazing! seriously i loved it very creative great special effects, scenery and makeup looked so real.
Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:29:41 AM | (Age Not Specified)
They have definitely grown up. This movie is easier to understand than the previous movie, and it also adds a great sense of humour. This is the best movie yet! It`s heading to the Oscars!!
Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:59:43 AM | (Age Not Specified)
Well, first off, this is going to be a first of many long points to make to prove to people why and why not to watch this movie. The movie, in overall sincerity, was medicore compared to the others, and was probably the worst Harry Yet. Why? Well, like many have mentioned already, the movie let TOOOO many important and key events and situations out. Ex. The whole Dobby aspect, The Dursley`s and the winner of the Triward tournament. Think about it, the whole movie was based on this event, and in the book, the winner is a key point to who wins, why and what it leads to. Second, because of the cutting of key points and vital aspect to the novel,
Sunday, November 20, 2005 12:30:28 AM | (Age Not Specified)
It was way better than the third movie. They changed stuff from the book, but it was either minor things, or they switched it in a way that made sense. Ofcourse the books are always better, but this was definitely very entertaining. Nicely done!!!
Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:37:51 PM | (Age Not Specified)
It`s exciting and funny, but i think 2 hrs is not enough. The director is rushing the movie there`s a lot of stuff missing they should have made it to around 2hrs 30mins. Other than that its better than the 3rd movie.
Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:32:28 PM | (Age Not Specified)
So totally awesome! You hafta see it! Read the book first, or the missing details will kinda ruin the movie. The book is way more detailed, but this was the best movie so far. Special effects were good (unlike other movies), and Voldemort looked so cool! *****Five stars all the way!*****
Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:17:07 PM | (Age Not Specified)
My goodness gosh! How have you guys not gone yet? GO NOW! NOW I`M TELLING YOU! I went and saw the very first showing of it at Silvercity yesterday, I`ve been waiting forever for this movie and it was definately worth the wait. I`m going to see it again and again and again. And so should you! GO NOW! WHAT ARE YOU STILL READING THIS FOR? GO NOW!
