Release Date: November 18, 2005 Director: Mike Newell Producer: David Heyman Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Brendan Gleeson, Richard Griffiths, Gary Oldman, Miranda Richardson, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Julie Walters, Stanislav Ianevski, Robert Pattinson, Clémence Poésy, David Tennant Genre: Fantasy Running Time: 156 minutes
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:27:11 AM | (Age Not Specified)
The best thing about this film is the chemistry between Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson -- it is just fantastic! They are a joy to watch and really make their scenes come alive! They just keep getting better and better as Harry and Hermione, and I can`t wait to see their performances in OotP (the next film). The twins were another highlight of the film, their humour was a nice distraction from the intensity. I also loved (LOVED!) Jason Isaacs as Lucius ... wow. He only has two scenes, but he steals the whole show. Just a delicious, gorgeous bit of evil. Overall, though, it felt very rushed and choppy (which is to be expected, I guess,
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:09:41 AM | (Age Not Specified)
I thought Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was a good all around movie. However, I am dissapointed that Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire didn`t stay that faithful to the book. It still was an entertaining movie though.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:19:59 AM | (Age Not Specified)
I really liked the movie. I would say it is rushed, but my husband (who hasn`t read the books) didn`t notice, and understood that was going on. The only people who will think people are confused are the ones that read it. I was disapointed however, with the way they are portraying Dumbledore. The first Dumbledore was better (which is unfortunate), but they could have picked a new actor and kept him true to Dumbledore`s character. For example in the movie when Harry`s name is pulled from the Goblet of Fire, and they go to the room and Dumbledore bursts in and basically strangles Harry and shouts at him, thats not what Dumbledore would do,
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:53:16 AM | (Age Not Specified)
its good and yet its also missing parts of the book i wish was in there.but what th writer took from the book and used in the movie did work fine. best out of the series so far. im still worried about the next book being so big it wont capture the movie feel in a 2 hr or so movie
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:06:44 AM | (Age Not Specified)
Great film. Yes I too would have like to have seen additonal scenes from the book, but alas artistic vision wins. Could it have been longer - absolutely. Can`t wait for the next film and book 7. Congratulations to all! /c from LONDON Ontario
Monday, November 21, 2005 11:40:48 PM | (Age Not Specified)
This was absouletelt the best movie I have ever see in my entire life!! Daniel, Rupert and Emma are all so talented. If you havent seen it you are missing out on one of the best movies of the century!!!! See it :D
Monday, November 21, 2005 11:40:03 PM | (Age Not Specified)
Ok I saw the movie ...... The BEST movie of the YEAR and that is saying something have not read the books but I could tell some things where missing but over all a great movie to go see and will see again. (P.S. the lord of the ring was missing alot of the story but still came out with a great moives so take a deep breath and just enjoy the ride.)(PPS yes wish they had more of the world cup stuff would make a great movie just a little better.)
Monday, November 21, 2005 10:14:36 PM | (Age Not Specified)
This movie was very dissapointing to me as I am a huge Harry Potter book fan. The special effects in this movie were much better but other then that the plot left out too many important things in the book, you hardly see any of the characters trying to figure out things like they do in the book. I wish PETER JACKSON made this movie, it would have been so much better then because the LOTR books were huge too but so well converted into a movie.
