Release Date: November 18, 2005 Director: Mike Newell Producer: David Heyman Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Brendan Gleeson, Richard Griffiths, Gary Oldman, Miranda Richardson, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Julie Walters, Stanislav Ianevski, Robert Pattinson, Clémence Poésy, David Tennant Genre: Fantasy Running Time: 156 minutes
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:59:09 PM | (Age Not Specified)
well...it has definetly exceeded my expectation this time! i couldn`t believe they were the same crew who did the earlier ones. they have definitely improved a lot!I hope they KEEP IT UP for the next ones! However...the Dumbledore absolutely sucks! his acting is horrible...he is too rough and obviously he doesn`t know about the character he is playing! he must be replaced
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:16:57 PM | (Age Not Specified)
This movie was truely amazing. Even thought it is missing some importants parts from the book it was still amazing. Dan, Rupert, and Emma have all learned to adapt to their characters perfectly. This year there is a new relationship for them awaiting at Hogwarts between the trio that show both love and enemies. I think this movie was totally worth waiting in line for hours. I`ve seen this movie only one and i`m definitly going again the next chance i get..even for people who don`t read the Harry Potter books understood what was happening even though it was missing some important details but overall it gave a perfect summary of what really hap
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:12:25 PM | (Age Not Specified)
I`m one of those people who feel as if the movie was rushed, but i read the book which may account for something. The action and everything was great, but the supposed darkness in it? Non-existent. Seeing Voldemort made me laugh!
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:11:20 PM | (Age Not Specified)
The movie on its own was a total success, very well done. I tip my hat to Mike Newell. But, as all movies have flaws, I found this movie`s flaw resided in the fact that it missed alot of crucial plot points mentionned within the novel. These plot points are cruical to the next book and/or movie. Also, things I would have liked to see on the big screen, I did not, for the movie did not follow the book exactly (Then again the other 3 weren`t completely true to their books either). Overall it was an enoyable film, and I recomend it to anyone who is a fan of the book series of Harry Potter film franchise.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 8:53:01 PM | (Age Not Specified)
I`ve seen it twice and I`m seeing it another 2 times. I laughed soooo much especially at the bath part!!!! That was sooo hilarious! This is defentily a must see movie but I`d say not for kids because it is a little creepy. Daneil Radcliffe is so sexy OMG! (I`d say something else but I`m sure I can`t say it) 5 out of 5 stars!
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:59:41 PM | (Age Not Specified)
I already saw the movie twice and i`m going again this week-end. However, it`s missing parts of the book, the movie is great. The best yet. The cast has grow so much, it`s amazing.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:39:14 PM | (Age Not Specified)
The movie was excellent. Because of the books length, it is impossible for all the parts in it to have been in the movie. If you are expecting the book in movie form, then you will be disappointed. Regardless, the movie on its own is excellent. You cannot expect a movie to portray a book exactly, they are different mediums. Very good movie.. SEE IT!
