Release Date: November 18, 2005 Director: Mike Newell Producer: David Heyman Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Brendan Gleeson, Richard Griffiths, Gary Oldman, Miranda Richardson, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Julie Walters, Stanislav Ianevski, Robert Pattinson, Clémence Poésy, David Tennant Genre: Fantasy Running Time: 156 minutes
Tuesday, November 29, 2005 10:19:57 AM | (Age Not Specified)
I think I expected more out of this film that I actually got, but besides that, the movie was visually amazing and I enjoyed it a lot more than the third film.
Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:48:42 AM | (Age Not Specified)
I was rather disappointed by this movie. Definitely not my favourite of the four, mainly because they ruined my favourite character for me by choosing the wrong actor to play the new Dumbledore. He obviously didn`t read the books, since he didn`t understand the character at all! They cut out a lot out of the book and changed some of the story in order for it to make sense, but I guess that it`s understandable due to the time constraint. I liked how they introduced a lot of new characters (although some of them didn`t look the way I imagined), but that just meant that each of them only appeared in about two scenes. Very poor character devel
Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:41:06 AM | (Age Not Specified)
everyone here that loves this movie are just a bunch of young dimwits that either are enfatuated with daniel or emma or the kid that plays ron.... and not into the actual harry potter story... for the true potter fans, this movie was a dissapointment, no Dursleys, no Winkie or Dobby, the Yule ball was a joke --> it was too modern... to normal... these characters are soon to be powerful wizards and witches, and apparntly Mike Newell forgot about that aspect of the story, he potrayed the hogwarts student body as a bunch of average teenagers..., also and most dissapoiinting was Dumbledore!!! Dumbledor`s character in the film was far from the all
Monday, November 28, 2005 9:19:49 PM | (Age Not Specified)
personally i dont like alot of animation. i think it makes the film look bad... but i like the really, really, realistic animations but they should act it out as much as they could. harry hermoine and the weasley boy should remember though, that just because they are in the series for good they cant rush through the acting or do it half-assed.
Monday, November 28, 2005 5:14:40 PM | (Age Not Specified)
HP4 was simply the best HP movie made to date. The scenes I had imagined in my head from reading the book were 1000x more fantastic on screen. The "scary" scenes in the book I found more scary on screen actually, and this is great how the director can achieve that without turning this into a 18a horror flick. Other scenes were amazing as well, from the gigantic Quidditch World Cup stadium, to the elegant, classy entrances made by the Beauxbaton/Durmstrang students...however I felt the workmanship shrunk a bit towards the ending. I thought the final task and the showdown with Voldemort would take up more time, but it was still stunning neve
Monday, November 28, 2005 3:22:02 PM | (Age Not Specified)
This was an EXCELLENT movie!! Even though I didn`t read the book, I still understood what went on!! From my understanding, there is more to the book then what`s in the movie. But it was just EXCELLENT. I HIGHLY recommend watching it. I can`t wait until #5...
