Greater Vancouver Movies

Mulholland Dr.

Mulholland Dr.

Score: 10 / 10

Release Date: October 26, 2001
Director: David Lynch
Producer: Alain Sarde, Joyce Eliason, Mary Sweeney, Michael Polaire, Neal Edelstein, Tony Krantz
Studio: TVA International
Starring: Dan Hedaya, Robert Forster, Justin Theroux, Naomi Watts, Laura Harring, Ann Miller, Mark Pellegrino, Brian Beacock, Katharine Towne, Lee Grant, Chad Everett, Kate Forster, Marcus Graham, Sean E. Markland, Monty Montgomery, Johanna Stein
Genre: Drama
Running Time: 146 minutes

Write a Review


Mulholland Dr. movie reviews

  • 10

    Mulholland Dr.

    Sunday, June 20, 2021 4:18:05 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    The ladies were really hot. Good lesbianism. Hot scene but it should have been much longer and much much more explicit. It's still hot enough to take root in your imagination and generate some really filthy fantasies. Check it out.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Sunday, January 30, 2005 3:20:31 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    Dude just threw a bunch of loose ideas together and decided it was a movie, far as I can tell. I`ve read some explanations for it, but you just can`t make that complicated a concept into a movie properly, man. Then again, this is the only movie of his I`ve seen, so maybe having no idea what`s going on is an aquired taste.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:04:41 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    There are movies that are deep and poetic, but this is too much. It was too weird to be interesting. It just became dumb even though it’s not.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Monday, September 27, 2004 2:45:06 AM | (age group: 25-34) | F

    honestly david lynch manages to give me everything i want in a movie. i thought the film was totally amasing and visually stunning.how does he do it time and again.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:03:52 AM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    definately my favourite movie. Lynch is an absolute genius with fantastic performances all round.I would have liked to have seen this as a series.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:00:07 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    All I can say,brilliant.A masterpeace.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:38:45 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    Very good, very freudian, a journey into a mind troubled with parental fixations. Extremely symbolic.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Monday, February 3, 2003 6:57:47 PM | (age group: 25-34) | M

    I`d like the 2-1/2 hours of my life back. i never watched twin peaks.. so i have no clue what was going on here!? the sound quality was terrible, i literally had to adjust the volume every 30-45 secs. - & who were those actors? it build me up for answers that were never provided. he could of at least put a 2 hour commentary at the end to explain what goes on the whole movie. watch it again to find out? u wish... snore

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:50:08 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    Brilliant. Lynch`s masterpiece so far. Well written...great acting...great directing. You have to see it more than once.

  • Mulholland Dr.

    Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:50:12 AM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    Maybe it was me and my friend`s mood, but we couldn`t even get through 3/4 of the movie. The first thing was that there seemed to be too much going on, and not enough explanation. Secondly, I think the casting directors must have pulled some of the actors right off of the stage, and tried to make them film actors! The acting overall, really sucked! Thirdly, there were some definitely corny corny lines. All the good I can really say is that the cinematography was of a very professional quality, and that maybe it could have been a good movie, given many many changes. But I should try watching it again when i am not so tired, mayeb that`ll